The Emperor's New Clothes
One Simple Question Changed the Perspective
Why does democracy ask voters to choose only one party when many could honestly support several?
That question was asked by a Swiss/Swedish high-school student during a school project.
It eventually became the starting point for PACER — Political Acceptability for Coalition-Enabling Representative Mandates.
What began as a simple observation has grown into a mathematical framework, a scientific research paper, and an invitation from Koalitionsbyggarna to explore how representative democracy might evolve.
PACER is PR (Proportional Representation) with an ace up its sleeve—but the ace doesn't come from the Speaker. It comes from the voters.
The Challenge
Democracy Should Learn Who Citizens Trust—and What They Care About
Today's elections reveal which party every voter prefer, but provide no information about which other parties voters would trust to participate in government or which emerging public concerns they consider particularly important.
As a result, representative democracy often learns about changing societal priorities only after voters have already abandoned established parties. By then, political identities may already have hardened, polarization may have increased, and opportunities for gradual democratic adaptation may have been lost.
Collecting Richer Democratic Information
Vote Splitting
Vote splitting is already used in several electoral systems. Rather than assigning the entire vote to a single party, it allows voters to distribute their support among multiple parties.
PACER extends this principle by using vote splitting to collect richer democratic information. It can reveal both which parties voters would trust to participate in government (political acceptability) and which emerging public concerns voters consider particularly important (issue salience).
Together, these complementary democratic signals can facilitate government formation while providing representative democracy with earlier indications of changing societal priorities.
Better Government Formation
Political Acceptability
To promote government formation, PACER lets voters express political acceptability, letting voters indicate which parties they would trust to represent them in government throughout the legislative period.
Political acceptability reveals governing arrangements that today's elections cannot observe. Coalition Builders would use all their mandates to facilitate government formation in accordance with voters' expressed political acceptability while remaining as close as possible to the proportional election result.
The Long-Term Vision
Stability Enables Democratic Diversity
Stable governments formation makes greater democratic diversity possible. An election system that facilitates stable government formation can permit lower parliamentary thresholds and become the foundation upon which a richer, more innovative, and more responsive parliamentary landscape develops.
Thereby, it becomes possible to incorporate a second democratic signal based on the issue salience of emerging public concerns.
Earlier Democratic Feedback
Democracy Learns Earlier
Today's electoral systems often detect political change only after voters have already abandoned established parties.
Vote splitting makes an earlier democratic signal possible.
Instead of observing only that voters have left, parties can observe where their voters' political flexibility lies.
Future extensions incorporating issue salience could provide an even earlier indication of emerging public concerns, before new political movements have accumulated sufficient delegated trust for government participation.
Political adaptation can therefore become gradual rather than abrupt.
An Important Role for Smaller Parties
Democratic Innovation
Smaller parties are no longer merely obstacles to government formation.
They become sources of democratic innovation and early democratic feedback.
They identify emerging concerns, test new political ideas, and encourage established parties to adapt before polarization becomes entrenched.
Why This Project Exists
Coalition Builders
Coalition Builders is not a political party in the traditional sense.
It is an initiative exploring one possible institutional improvement of representative democracy.
Its purpose is to stimulate discussion, research and experimentation around PACER.
If the democratic institutions of the future one day render Coalition Builders redundant, the initiative will have achieved its goal—a far more modest ambition than Karl Marx’s dream of the withering away of the state.
Learn More
Read, Listen, Discuss
Discuss
Researchers, journalists, students, policymakers and interested citizens are warmly invited to contribute criticism, ideas and further research.
Contact us at: Loading email...